JOHN CONNALLY KILLED JFK

CONNALLY WAS THE ASSASSIN

THE TWO CONSPIRITORS

IT MIGHT BE TO LATE FOR JUSTICE BUT NOT FOR THE TRUTH

Explore the controversial theories surrounding the JFK assassination, focusing on John Connally's alleged involvement, the doctored Zapruder film. John Connally was not a victim, but was the assassin.

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, remains one of the most analyzed and debated events in American history. While the official narrative points to Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone gunman, countless alternative theories emerge, each with its own set of evidentiary claims. Among these, one of the more controversial perspectives revolves around John Connally, the former Governor of Texas, who was present in the motorcade on that fateful day. In a twist that challenges conventional wisdom, there are theories suggesting that Connally was not merely an innocent bystander but rather a key player, if not the assassin himself. This narrative is further complicated by the notion of a doctored Zapruder film, which many claim has been altered to conceal the truth. ### The Context: The Day of the Assassination On that day in Dallas, the motorcade wove through Dealey Plaza, with Kennedy in the open-topped limousine, accompanied by Connally and his wife, Nellie. Shots rang out, and in a matter of seconds, history changed forever. The official accounts state that Kennedy was struck by bullets fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, where Oswald was later arrested. However, Connally himself was struck by a bullet during the same incident, which has led to various interpretations and subsequent misunderstandings surrounding his role. ### The Theory: Connally as the Assassin Proponents of the theory that John Connally was involved in the assassination of JFK often point to several key pieces of circumstantial evidence. First, there is the argument that since Connally was seated directly in front of Kennedy, he would have had both the opportunity and the motive. As a prominent political figure in Texas, Connally had ambitions and political ties that some theorists suggest may have been adversely affected by JFK’s presidency. Speculation arises that Connally, seeking to solidify his position or to manipulate the political landscape, could have conspired to remove Kennedy from power. Moreover, advocates of this theory often cite Connally’s peculiar behavior post-assassination. His decision to focus not on the events unfolding around him but rather on his own injuries has been interpreted as suspicious. Many contend that his actions were intended to deflect attention from himself, creating a narrative that painted him as a victim rather than a potential perpetrator. ### The Role of the Zapruder Film Complicating the debate is the critically important Zapruder film, shot by bystander Abraham Zapruder. This piece of footage has been analyzed frame by frame to deduce the precise nature of the assassination. Controversially, some conspiracy theorists argue that the film has been doctored to remove or alter crucial evidence that could implicate Connally in the assassination plot. They argue that changes may have been made to hide the true number of shots fired or the direction from which they originated, thereby blurring the line of accountability. The argument follows that Connally, having been struck in the same incident, may have been part of a larger conspiracy that relied on misdirection. As Connally is often portrayed as an innocent victim in both the Zapruder film and the broader media narrative, the alteration of this key evidence becomes a focal point for theories that attempt to reposition him as a more sinister figure in the assassination.